The accu measure people cited some studies on their product one of which compared the accuracy of one measurement at the suprailliac vs. multiple measurement sites. The study found that increasing the number of sites measured with a caliper did little to increase the accuracy of the reading.
But with the accu measure the real point is simply to track progress, not necessarily to get a really precise measurement (though it is supposed to be as accurate as any other method except under water weighing).
For that you only really need one measurement at the suprailliac.
If I measure and find 28% it doesn't matter that much whether I'm really 27% or 30%... the key is that the next time I measure and find that I'm 27% and then 26%, I know I'm going in the right direction and what I'm doing is working.
You are right about the tape measure that is recommended for obese people. Personally, since I'm on the border line of obese, I started using both. I use tape measure and a formula I found on Dave draper's website which uses a measurement at the umbilicus for men. I also use the caliper and kind of compare the two.
So far, the caliper has been pretty close to the tape measure method, but usually it is a little lower. The tape measure gives me someting like 28% where as the accu measure gives me like 27%. usually they are within 1% or 1.5% for me.
I'm afraid I have no wife so I can't rely on the scream test
