by itsbruce » Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:30 am
If you're not already fat, it's hard to put on muscle - enough to keep making progress - without adding a little weight. I was your weight (and an inch taller) for most of this year but was 72.5kg when I started this course (my routine and diet was interrupted by several changes of location in a month); not fat or even overweight by any healthy standard, but a few pounds heavier than I wanted to be. When I started the program, I decided I wasn't going to try and lose that weight, because the strength gain is more important, but I didn't want to get any fatter. So while I did increase my intake (to about 2750 calories) and dramatically shifted the balance towards protein, I didn't do GOMAD or any kind of bulking up. I've shifted between doing no cardio at all to doing as much as 45 minutes at the end of a session, depending on how I'm feeling.
9 weeks in, My weight has increased by about 1 kilo, 9 weeks into the course, and my body fat has gone down slightly (unreliable measure as that is). I have made very measurable strength gains and I do look more muscular. That said, I am sure I would be further ahead if I had just gone for bulk; personal vanity is undeniably holding me back to some extent. Not bulking up means that it's even more important to concentrate on technique, which is not easy when you are doing this on your own. I feel that I am hitting limits earlier than I would have if I had gone all out for growth.
So how much do the potential strength gains matter to you? Doing it the minimal-weight-gain way is much the harder route for most people, I think.
Bruce's logWanted: More upper body strength.
Squat: 105kg 5x5
Deadlift: 125kg 1x5
Press: 45kg 5x5
Bench: 60kg 5x5