

The Bent Press to the Bench Press: Assertions of Male Strength and Beauty from Sandow to Schwarzenegger
Here it is guys and gals, thanks for all of your encouragement and input.
I was inspired to write this essay after reading, here and on other forums, posts that described Eugen Sandow's physique as 'undeveloped', or stating that his knowledge of training was primitive. Both ideas, I believe, are ahistorical. That is, they are judging the past by present standards. I instinctively felt that the idea that Sandow's pectoral muscles are not as developed as those of more modern bodybuilders because he didn't know how to build big pectoral muscles is flawed. Rather, I would assert that his pectoral muscles are not as developed because he did not want or need them to be so, due to very different ideals of strength and aesthetics that existed in the Victorian era. This essay is me exploring and expanding on that idea.
Bear in mind that this is for a history graduate paper in which we were exploring a specific kind of theory and methodology. That's why there is a lot of 'socio-cultural' this and 'aesthetic ideal' that in my prose. This is also because I'm largely a social constructivist in my historical thinking, but I do try to ground my arguments in solid historical source material.
I'm very much open to discussion and criticism, so have at it.


