eLvarouza wrote:How in God's name can a scale tell you your bodyfat percentage?
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
Another common method of body fat testing is bioelectrical impedance. You lie on your back while a signal travels from an electrode on your foot to an electrode on your hand. The slower the signal, the more fat you have, because fat impedes the signal.
BIA testing divides the body up into 'cylinders'. The arm, the torso, the upper leg, and the lower leg make up four separate cylinders for purposes of this test. The current flows through your body, finding varying resistance depending on the density of your muscle, the amount of body fat encountered, and the hydration of your tissue.
Bioelectrical impedance can have a huge margin of error, especially if you're extremely fat or extremely lean. In one study, world-class female distance runners averaged 20 percent body fat, when more reliable methods showed that they were closer to 10 percent. Dehydration also can skew the results; the signal slows down, and you appear to have more fat than you really do.
The following rules must be followed to give any credence to the tests:
* Abstain from eating and drinking within 4 hours of the test
* Avoid exercising within 12 hours of the test
* Void (urinate) completely prior to testing
* Do not drink alcohol within 48 hours of the test
* Avoid taking diuretics prior to testing unless instructed by your physician
If you follow all of these rules you can get a pretty accurate reading. Compared to other testing methods (circumference, skin-caliper) this is the least accurate field test. Unfortunately, past history has shown that the protocol rules aren't usually followed. Often the test administrators don't make the rules clear; they are misunderstood, or just not taken seriously. In which case a much greater than necessary amount of error creeps into the equation.
BIA can give a very consistent test-retest result when given back to back. But inconsistency in hydration, body fluids and intestinal content can result in high degree of variation from day to day. This makes this test far less suitable for repeated testing when measuring small changes in body fat level.
Be wary of studies sponsored by the BIA companies themselves, showing their devices to have accuracy levels close to hydrostatic. Studies by the NIH, ACSM, AHA, US NAVY, and numerous other independent bodies consistently give this test at least a 3% margin of error when the protocols are followed and confirm the test inaccuracies at the extremes of the body fat scale.
There are several methods out there.
· One is a scale you stand on and the electrical resistance is measured up one leg and down the other. Then a formula with an assumption related to all the fat vs. lean mass above the pelvic is added and the resulting number is displayed.· Another is a device you hold at arms length. Again, the resistance is up one arm and down the other. The another assumptive formula related to all fat and lean mass below the shoulders is factored into the scenario and viola’, your body fat percentage is displayed.
Additional Problems related to BIA
In 82% of population, within +-3%
In 18% of population, 4-20% error
Derived result: based on Hydrostatic comparison
Proprietary population dependent formulae
Higher standard error range than other tests
Vastly overestimate lean, inaccurate among obese
Hydration, skin-temp, test condition compound error
Inaccurate for small changes