Welcome Guest

  • Welcome to the StrongLifts.com Forum, a place for intelligent discussion about losing fat, building muscle, getting stronger, eating healthier and much more.

    You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining the free StrongLifts.com community, you'll be able to post messages & videos, keep an online training log, see new messages posted since your last visit and remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple and 100% free!

    Click here to join the StrongLifts.com Community today.

    I really debated about starting a log. This journey gets very personal at times. It's hard to announce to the world things you didn't even want to admit to yourself. But that's why I did it. It needed to be right in front of me so I could deal with it head on. And I needed support to get through it. Who would have thought I'd find that here of all places. :lol: But I did. These guys have been a great help and encouragement through some tough times for me and they probably don't even realize it. - Pagangoddess


im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Bigger chest, bigger arms, 6-pack abs, bigger calves, x-shape.

im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby klauitzsex » Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:26 pm


Click here to register for free and get rid of this ad.
while I enjoy liftin weights , especially with this very structured program, i dont look like someone who has lifted weights in his spare time for a long time (albeit not as organised as I should, but still). Statistically i'm stronger (worked up from nothin to a 60kg front squat, although my bench is practically been the same for years, no idea why), but i dont look it. How can I be advancin the weight but not addin mass? infact some muscles look like theyve gotten smaller since doing full bodies routines (namely bi's n tris, thought chins and BORs would of sorted them out)
klauitzsex
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:57 pm

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby mjh » Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:33 pm

well, the question is what is your diet like? because it's eating food, not lifting weights, that is going to add mass. Are you eating to get bigger?

(ps. moved this to the body recomposition forum, fits better there).
User avatar
mjh
Moderator
 
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:13 am
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby jester87 » Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:27 pm

dude, yeah, eating is so important... i remember doing like 200reps bicep curls with 15kg weights on each arm... and my biceps got smaller WTF!!!! that was so freaking hilarious! i just didnt effing understand why? now i do though, i ate next to nothing in protein... i took like 1protein shake worth maybe 30g protein each day i was working out and frankly, that didnt help!

nowadays, i eat like 200g+ protein everyday excluding shakers and my bicpes gotten much more defined withouth having done any curls since i started the stronglifts 5x5!
User avatar
jester87
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:57 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby Bluegreyhound » Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:56 pm

You aren't eating enough to bulk up. That aside, you are getting stronger in the gym through CNS gains, improved muscular coordination and lifting technique.
User avatar
Bluegreyhound
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 915
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 9:51 pm

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby CheshireCat » Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:56 pm

Most people get stronger before they get bigger, alot is to do with neural adoptation, i.e. you "learn" to lift more weight. Bluegreyhound is correct above.

Mass gains come with time and the correct diet.
CheshireCat
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:49 pm

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby javanek » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:08 pm

I think you're looking at the problem in the wrong light. If you want big muscles you want more of a body building routine/plan. If you want strength you do strength training. I see a lot of people confused by this. While either one does build strength to an extent, they are completely different. Big muscles aren't necessarily strong and strong muscles aren't necessarily big. If you are wanting to 'see' results the best thing to do is drop your BF%. Then the muscles will show. I don't see myself getting a lot bigger in arms legs or chest, but the numbers in my log show the difference. (Not the log here so much, but the paper log from when I started two years ago.)
Javanek's Training Log
5'11" · 228lbs · 41yo · PR: Squat 325lbs · Bench 205lbs · OHP 125lbs · Deadlift 355lbs
Gyminee Profile
User avatar
javanek
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:26 pm
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby capedcrusader » Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:10 pm

more strength is more muscle, as long as your eating for size as your lifts go up muscle mass will increase.
capedcrusader
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:46 pm

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby capedcrusader » Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:13 pm

and your bench has been the same for years!! are you attepmting to up the weight or go for more reps?

i think its obvious that your not eating.
capedcrusader
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:46 pm

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby overdrive23 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:25 pm

maybe you were a fat(ter) kid before you started and you replaced fat with muscle.....


but i agree with what the majority of others are saying when they say:

"YOU AREN'T EATING ENOUGH TO GROW"

Trust me, if your not growing, your not eating enough.....I'm a Doctor.

And a lier! (About being a Dr)
overdrive23
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:36 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: im statistically stronger but dont look any different

Postby tkxii » Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:00 pm

javanek wrote:I think you're looking at the problem in the wrong light. If you want big muscles you want more of a body building routine/plan. If you want strength you do strength training. I see a lot of people confused by this. While either one does build strength to an extent, they are completely different. Big muscles aren't necessarily strong and strong muscles aren't necessarily big. If you are wanting to 'see' results the best thing to do is drop your BF%. Then the muscles will show. I don't see myself getting a lot bigger in arms legs or chest, but the numbers in my log show the difference. (Not the log here so much, but the paper log from when I started two years ago.)


Yea that sums it all up. Word. I'm a jumper/sprinter on track and field. I do the lowest reps possible, and i don't look much bigger than before. This is because the type of muscle hypertrophy that I undergo, is called myofibrillar hypertrophy - the protein of the muscle cell gets bigger. The other type, sarcoplasmic, is when the cell volume increases - you would need to do higher reps for this, and get that 'burn.' Five by 5 is supposed to be the best of both worlds, but perhaps you are taking too large of a rest period. Rest like 45 seconds maximum, hope that helps. And you said you haven't increased your bench in years - try resting less. There was a time where i could not get sore from chest workouts, and then i learned that i was resting wayy too long - 5 minutes. Rest 30-1:30. But don't sit by a clock and count seconds, you have to have a feel for how your muscles are doing. Pace yourself so that the last rep is total failure.
tkxii
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:09 am


Return to Build Muscle

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Get My Free eBook
  • Learn how to build muscle and lose fat with strength training in only 3 workouts per week. Click here for more info.
  •