Welcome Guest

  • Welcome to the StrongLifts.com Forum, a place for intelligent discussion about losing fat, building muscle, getting stronger, eating healthier and much more.

    You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining the free StrongLifts.com community, you'll be able to post messages & videos, keep an online training log, see new messages posted since your last visit and remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple and 100% free!

    Click here to join the StrongLifts.com Community today.

    I really debated about starting a log. This journey gets very personal at times. It's hard to announce to the world things you didn't even want to admit to yourself. But that's why I did it. It needed to be right in front of me so I could deal with it head on. And I needed support to get through it. Who would have thought I'd find that here of all places. :lol: But I did. These guys have been a great help and encouragement through some tough times for me and they probably don't even realize it. - Pagangoddess


The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Food, supplements, diets, recipes.

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby steelcutoats » Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:15 am


Click here to register for free and get rid of this ad.
FWIW, I posted my initial reaction to this formula when I was very early on in the program, lifting very easy weights for form.

It's now two months on, and I eat a horredous shit ton of food, easily 4000cal+ per day.
Don't get rolled! stats (Jan 11, 2010) M, age 36, height: 6ft, 3in, weight 234.5 lbs, long limbed build
PRs : squats: 235lbs 5x5 deadlift: 325lbs 1x5 bench: 180lbs 5x5 press: 112.5lbs 5x5
steelcutoats
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby Crush » Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:47 pm

I see that intense weight lifting is 6, but what number should I use to represent running?
Crush
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby iCookie » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:40 pm

Anybody knows where I can download a Excel version of the spreadsheet?

The one on the site is full of bugs...it doesn't even work.
iCookie
Banned
 
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:34 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby PhoenixAD » Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:19 pm

iCookie wrote:hm, phoenixAD, I seem to get an error saying "you entered someting improperly"...

I entered all numbers and tried both comma and period to separate decimals...


Here's example data that I used to validate

Weight (lbs) : 190
Body Fat % : 0.38
Thermic Effect of Food : 0.05
Activity : 1.5
MET : 6
Duration : 1


My guess would be the body fat was not properly formatted. This was something quick I threw together without as much validation. I will make some updates later to it to make it more user friendly.
Best 5x5 so far.. (short term Goals)
Weight : 235 lbs (200) Height : 6'
Bench : 185 lbs (200)
Deadlift : 205 lbs (225)
Overhead Press : 115 lbs (135)
Box Squat : 220 lbs (275)
User avatar
PhoenixAD
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:26 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby grglandr » Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:16 pm

I found the Cunningham seemed too high also.

I have been using the calorie range dailyburn.com gave me, and it seems to be about right. (about 2300 to 2600 for loosing weight)
Do, or do not... There is no try
____________________________
SL 5x5 2+ Months
HT:5'11" | WT:245lbs | BF:31%
SQ:190lbs | BP:165lbs | DL:185bs | OP:105lbs
Training Log | Daily Burn Profile
User avatar
grglandr
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby Subsistence » Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:13 am

This has been working well for me as a total beginner for gaining lean weight with minimal fat. I'll be keeping it up for another month or so and then try to melt off a few lbs of fat.
Subsistence
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:59 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby codygman » Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:21 am

It says I need 7169 Calories a day according to rossi's spreadsheet. I'm doing the 5x5 method, as well as 2-4 hours a day doing parkour/freerunning, still this seems a bit high? Does it seem right to you guys?
My Training Log
6'3" · 198lbs · 18yo · 1RM: Squat TBD · Bench 180lbs · OHP 125lbs · Deadlift TBD
codygman
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:29 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby iCookie » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:46 pm

codygman wrote:It says I need 7169 Calories a day according to rossi's spreadsheet. I'm doing the 5x5 method, as well as 2-4 hours a day doing parkour/freerunning, still this seems a bit high? Does it seem right to you guys?


Oh nice, another one doing parkour :D

7169 seems very high if you ask me, but if you do parkour for about 3-4 hours it might be about right.

I usually consume maximum 6000kcal when doing parkour for 3 hours and 5x5 for 2 hours...
iCookie
Banned
 
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:34 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby dylanamus » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:51 am

SL + 2-4 hours of parkour a day! Jesus... if you already have a decent amount of muscle on your frames, then I wouldn't be surprised if 6 or 7000kcal wasn't enough to maintain! Baring in mind some athletes who spend several hours a day in training consume twice that amount just to maintain their lean mass.
My Training Log | My AD Log
158cm/5'2", 59.5kg/132lb, 13.8% BF

Current 1RMs achieved at >=60kg on Texas Method:
Squat: 152.5kg / 150kg
DL: 150kg / 160kg
OHP: 65kg /70kg
Bench: 87.5kg / 90kg
dylanamus
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 1402
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:46 am

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby holvoetn » Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:08 am

dylanamus wrote:SL + 2-4 hours of parkour a day! Jesus... if you already have a decent amount of muscle on your frames, then I wouldn't be surprised if 6 or 7000kcal wasn't enough to maintain! Baring in mind some athletes who spend several hours a day in training consume twice that amount just to maintain their lean mass.


I think the most I have ever seen being mentioned was Michael Phelps during the Olympics, he consumed 11000-12000 :shock:
I prefer to be called 'H' ;)

Age: 41 / Height: 180cm/5ft 11" / BW: 87kg/191lbs
PRs:
SQ 1RM 170kg/374lbs / BP 1RM 90kg/198lbs / OHP 1RM 67.5kg/148.5lbs / BBR 1RM 115kg/253lbs / DL 1RM 210kg/462lbs

H's Log 2010
User avatar
holvoetn
Moderator
 
Posts: 4628
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 6:21 pm
Location: Sitting on a hernia ...

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby Bman1 » Thu Dec 17, 2009 6:24 am

Read an article about that Michael Phelps calorie intake. Apparently, it was only a couple of times that he actually ate that many calories in a day and his daily average was more like 5000 or 6000 calories. Still a lot of food though.
Bob - 48 yr old, 5'10", currently 185 lbs (down from 220+ in Dec 08)
5 RMs as of 2/22/10
Squat -235 lbs Bench - 190 lbs
DL - 330 lbs. BB Row - 185 lbs
OHP - 125 lbs
Bman1
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:24 am

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby rossi » Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:14 am

The online spreadsheet is really troublesome: many users at the same time, large amounts of worksheets (all get loaded into memory), and sometimes bad luck or occasional vandalism. I've rewritten the thing in javascript into a clean html page, so everything happens client-side. Shouldn't be any more problems (except for the NoScript-posse of course). I'm still tweaking the layout a bit, but will have a version up shortly.

About the equation itself, until now we have used it with no knowledge of the underlying science or studies. I couldn't find the original Cunningham paper from 1991 or other analysis. There are some comparisons with other formula's for old women and fat children, and there it overestimates the BMR. I have read that it's supposed to be an estimator only for athletes. Does anyone here know more?
"Don't ask for a lighter burden to carry, ask for stronger shoulders to carry it"
My Training Log
178cm · 68kg · 24y/o ···· :>1RM Squat 90kg · Bench 85kg · OHP 50kg · Deadlift 95kg
Wilks 205--BMI 21--fat%10%--
rossi
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Flanders

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby cervenyc » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:53 pm

lovestolift wrote:Here's something that may be helpful in planning your body composition goals:

Calculating Target Bodyweight (TBW):
1) Get your BF% measured, & realize that this is an educated guess at best. Get your your 1st thing in the morning weight.
2) Calculate your fat mass (BF% divided by 100, multiply by total weight).
3) Subtract fat mass from total weight, this is your lean body mass (LBM).
4) Decide how much lbs of muscle you wanna gain or lose (hah), then add this to your LBM. If you wanna maintain, then don't mess with this number.
5) Multiply your target LBM by 100.
6) Divide the answer of step 5 by the following calculation: 100 minus whatever BF% you're shooting for. This gives you your target bodyweight (TBW) at your goal body comp.

I've blatantly stolen it form here:http://www.muscleandscience.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2552


So does this mean you (we/I) should calculate the CE for my ideal composition? At my current stats (172lb 17%bf) it says I should be eating 3000 calories for maintenance (non-training), but if I set a goal to stay the same weight but less fat (10% goal body fat), my maintenance calories are 2400 (ntd). It doesn't make sense to me that dropping my current maintenance calories by 500 (1 lb fat loss per week) would result in a gain in lean body mass. So what values should I use?

This is important because if my current calorie goals (2500 w/ additional deficit created from workouts based on CE w/ current stats) is too large a deficit, given that CE estimates seem high, will I stall from too great of a deficit? How will I know?
My Training Log

Stats: 28 Feb 2010
BW: 77.8
5x5 Training
Squat: BW x 1.14 Woot!!!
Deadlift: BW x 1.43
Bench: BW x 0.9 (stall)
OHP: BW x 0.61 (stall)
Row: BW x 0.58
cervenyc
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:22 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby manley0702 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:54 pm

i'm about 900kCal less than the equation says. My main goal is to lose weight. However, I would like to gain muscle too. I am doing SL and also BJJ 3 days a week. Will I still gain lean muscle?
manley0702
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:28 pm

Re: The Cunningham Equation -An accurate way to predict calories

Postby HokieHard » Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:46 pm

The equation states I need 6438 calories on training days, that is somewhat of an unbelievable caloric intake for me if this is the recommended maintenance level. I am 95.2 kg @ 10% BF and do madcow's 5x5 3x per week and ingest about 160g of protein per day(about .8g/lb).
20, 6' 0'' 203 lbs

Personal Records
Squat: 375 1RM
Deadlift: 365 1RM
Bench Press: 260 1RM
Press: 155 5RM
HokieHard
StrongLifts Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:18 am

PreviousNext

Return to Nutrition

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

  • Get My Free eBook
  • Learn how to build muscle and lose fat with strength training in only 3 workouts per week. Click here for more info.
  •